Whitecaps win over Montreal nothing to gloat about

May 6, 2011 at 5:15 am | Posted in Vancouver Whitecaps In MLS, Whitecaps Season 2011 | 4 Comments

Last night the Vancouver Whitecaps played the second leg of the Nutrilite Canadian Championship semi-final at home against the Montreal Impact.  They won the total goal series 2-1 having scored one goal at home and one in Montreal.  To say the Whitecaps were lucky to win the series would be an understatement.

In fact, the Montreal Impact snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.  In the last play of extra time Montreal Striker Ali Gerba launched his body full length into a free header with the entire Whitecaps goal at his mercy.   He was completely unmarked, and Whitecaps keeper Jay Nolly did not even know he was coming.  Gerba’s header glanced the far post and went wide.  All of the Whitecaps players and coaches looked stunned and embarrassed, and so they should be.  To have so many men forward in the final stages of the match when we had a one goal lead was a  scandal.  It was a scandal that both central defenders Maloud Akloul and Greg Janicki lost track of the Impact’s most deadly striker at the crucial last moment of the game.

Ali Gerba: You Fat Bastard!

While Akloul scored the goal which won us the series in the 113th minute to make it 2-1 in the series, he was exposed at the back several times and looked more keen to score than to defend.  His partner, Janicki, looked very shaky, and could have cost us the match with his mistakes.  Several Montreal crosses dropped in our box without a touch from our central defenders, and would have been goals had Montreal strikers not been just as incompetent as our defenders. If this was an MLS game we would have been soundly defeated with this kind of lackadaisical defending.  Akloul seemed incapable of winning a one-on- one battle to head high balls, which is a critical failing for a central defender.

The Montreal Impact play in the division 2 NASL, the division below us, but to give them credit, they played some very sophisticated football and would have won but for sloppy finishing.  The Impact has never been a team to try to create many chances on goal, but have always focussed on finishing the few chances they do get.   This formula nearly worked to defeat us last night.

Our goal in the 113 minute again came from our best and wisest footballer, Alain Rochat.  On a free kick deep in Montreal territory, Rochat sought to win a rebound from the keeper for one of our players to finish off.  It was perfectly executed.  Rochat hit the ball hard and low forcing a save from  Montreal’s keeper Gaudette, who coughed up a rebound for Akloul to swat home. It was a textbook free kick which redeemed the pathetic free kicks the Whitecaps had taken earlier in the match.

I felt this game might be the opportunity to play the ball along the ground and dominate Montreal with a possession game, but we were not able to string too many passes together before losing the ball.  The Whitecaps too many times played long balls to Hassli and Salgado up front, who struggled to keep possession without proper midfield support.  While I appreciate Teitur Thordarson played an attacking game, I think he should have emphasized possession and creating quality chances.  Instead, we attacked with a lot of enthusiasm but not a lot of skill or planning, and the result was Montreal were able to defend in front of a sharp keeper without a lot of trouble.

Frankly, I was a bit embarrassed to have Montreal so close to defeating us. We are supposed to be a division above them, yet they played as well as we did, and the margin between victory and defeat was literally a razor’s edge.  Last night’s game illustrated our team still needs a lot of work. Though we scored on a well executed free kick, our other free kicks were an embarrassment, and I hope they get to practicing set plays in training, because it is obvious they need work.

Though I am happy we won, I don’t take a lot of joy from this game because we were very close indeed to a humiliating defeat at the hands of one of our great rivals. I feel more a sense of relief than of joy. The Vancouver Whitecaps need a lot of work,and the squad needs strengthening if we are to win more games this season on something other than dumb luck.

Time to spend some of that money that we have heard about!

He won us the match: but can he defend?



RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. Spot-on write up!

  2. Thanks for your comment Aaron.

  3. Good write up. Here are my expectations on the whitecaps.

    Hi, I have been a diehard whitecaps fan now for over a decade and to be honest i expect more from them. I wasn’t sure if I was being too hard on them so my ten year old son asked me “well how are we doing against other new teams”. So taking a look at some recent first year stats:

    1) TFC 2007: 25 pts. in 30 games played (.83pts/game). 6 wins, 17 losses, 7 ties.
    2) Seattle 2009: 47 pts. in 30 games played (1.56 pts./game). 12-7-11T Made playoffs
    3) Philadelphia 2010: 31 pts. in 30 games played (1.03 pts./game). 8-15-7T
    This year with 34 games these teams above projected: TFC would have had approx.. 7 wins (28 pts), Seattle 13 wins (53pts), Philly 9 wins (35 pts)

    a) Portland 2011: 13 pts. In 8 games (1.62 pts./game) 4 wins on pace for 55pts , a playoff spot and 17 wins
    b) Vancouver 2011: 6 pts in 8 games (0.75 pts/game), 1 win on pace for 26pts (with 4 more games that TFC in 2007), 4 wins.

    Ite early but 1/4 of the season is gone after tonight. Whitecaps had a well-established organization, a whole year to try out new players in 2010 etc. so in this first year I expect something better than TFC and Philly who started from scratch. Something more aligned with Seattle and Portland. If we do indeed finish around 25-26 pts and 4 wins then we go down as one of the weakest expansion teams in MLS history

    So yes good entertaining soccer, competitive games but I refuse to lower the bar too much. In short we need to at least have a better first year then TFC (adjusted for 34 games)7+ wins, 28 pts. Minimum and i would like to see us do better than Philly (34 games) – 9+ wins, 35 pts

    If others can see of a more apples to apples way to compare i am open for suggestions.


    • RHM: Thanks for your thoughtful projections! I think if we lose this match to Chicago it is time to declare a crisis!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.

%d bloggers like this: